Category Archives: Apologetics

Chosen From the Womb

… God, who separated me from my mother’s womb … (Galatians 1:15)

Paul, in making his case to the Galatians for his apostleship, makes a striking statement that is overlooked or blatantly ignored by the proponents of easy abortions.  Sadly, a large number of so-called Christians fall into this camp.  Here, Paul states in no uncertain terms that his call “to preach him among the heathen” (v. 16) came before he was even born.

That human life is precious to God is clearly demonstrated in the pages of the Bible.  When Cain murdered his brother Abel, God quickly called him to account:  “What hast thou done? The voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.  And now art thou cursed from the earth which hath opened up her mouth to receive thy brother’s blood” (Genesis 4:10-11).  Then to discourage others from murdering Cain, “the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold” (Genesis 4:15).  Over a millennia and a half later, when Noah exited the ark, God assigned the protection of life to man: “And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man’s brother will I require the life of man.  Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man” (Genesis 9:5-6).

Then the question arises, “When does life begin?”  To the biologist, human life begins at the union of the sperm with the ovum, but to the secular scientist, that is “biological” human life (Greek: bíos) without the essence (Greek: zoé) of humanity or “personhood.”  This then becomes a philosophical question.  Does the “thing” become a person at conception, or after the first trimester from conception, or after the second, or the third?  Some go so far assign the quality of personhood long after the birth of the creature, even up to three years.  Killing such a creature can then be justified seeing “it” is not a “person.”

God makes no such distinctions.  From the moment of conception, and even before then, the child is a human being, a person – the image of God.  To make this point clear, God established laws to protect the child in the womb making it a capital offense to take the life of a fully developed unborn child. (Exodus 21:22-23).   The psalmist declares “My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth.  Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them” (Psalm 139:15-16).  God spoke to the prophet Jeremiah and said, “Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations” (Jeremiah 1:5).  Life is precious to God.  Even before conception He has devised a plan for every life He creates in the womb.  Since it is God that creates, gives and sustains life, abortion is never justified or acceptable from His perspective.  That being so, it makes sense that anyone who fears God, would and should share the same perspective.

Comments Off on Chosen From the Womb

Filed under Apologetics, Christianity, Creation, Current Events, Pro-life, Religion

Who or What Are Witnesses?

But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.  (Acts 1:8)

Acts 1:8 and Hebrews 12:1 both translate the Greek word mártus as “witnesses.”  In Acts 1:8 the sense is that of someone who bears witness to an event, while in Hebrews 12:1 the sense seems to be that of spectators observing an event.  Taking the apparent sense of Acts 1:8, a witness is someone who would testifies before a court trial and provides an eyewitness account, or some other form of evidence used to substantiate the facts of an event.  However, in Hebrews 12:1, the sense seems to be that of a crowd observing a sports event and cheering on their favorite team.  Considering that “witnesses” is translating the same Greek word in both Acts 1:8 and Hebrews 12:1, how do we reconcile the apparent discrepancy?

The word “witness” or “witnesses” is used extensively throughout the N.T. and also in the O.T.  The word “witness” or “witnesses” appears 184 times in the King James Bible (KJV):  87 times in the O.T. and 97 times in the N.T.  Seventy-one times in the O.T. the KJV translates the Hebrew (Strong’s OT 5707) `ed; contracted from OT: 5749 concretely, a witness; abstractly, testimony; specifically, a recorder, i.e. prince:  KJV – witness.[1]  Isaiah 33:8 translates `ed as “the cities”:  “The highways lie waste, the wayfaring man ceaseth: he hath broken the covenant, he hath despised the cities, he regardeth no man” (emphasis added).  Here, it is “the cities” that are “the record” or “the witness” to a broken covenant, but in every other appearance the word is simply translated “witness” or “witnesses.”  Four times the KJV translates the Hebrew(Strong’s OT 5749) `uwd (ood); a primitive root; to duplicate or repeat; by implication, to protest, testify (as by reiteration); intensively, to encompass, restore (as a sort of reduplication):  KJV – admonish, charge, earnestly, lift up, protest, call (take) to record, relieve, rob, solemnly, stand upright, testify, give warning, (bear, call to, give, take to) witness.  This word appears 44 times in the O.T. and is translated in several different ways, but always with the sense of bearing witness to something.

In the N.T., mártus appears 35 times: three times it is translated as “martyr” (Acts 22:20; Revelation 2:13; 17:6) and twice it is translated as “record” (2 Corinthians 1:23; Philippians 1:8).  Otherwise it is simply translated as “witness.”  Strong’s defines mártus [Strong’s NT 3144]:  of uncertain affinity; a witness (literally [judicially] or figuratively [genitive case]); by analogy, a “martyr”:  KJV – martyr, record, witness.  The verb form of the word, marturéo [Strong’s NT 3140], means:  to be witness, i.e. testify (literally or figuratively):  KJV – charge, give [evidence], bear record, have (obtain, of) good (honest) report, be well reported of, testify, give (have) testimony, (be, bear, give, obtain) witness.

Both the O.T. and the N.T. favor the sense that a witness is someone or something that gives testimony or evidence to a fact.  In Acts 1:8 Jesus said: “ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem …”  In other words, “go bear testimony of Me.  If someone asks you about Me, give them the factual record of Me.  You may even have to die for your testimony.”

Hebrews 12:1 seems to present a different picture:  “Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses.”  From the English construction, it appears that the witnesses are spectators to an event.  Indeed, Robertson says: “An old word (Latin: nubes), here only in the New Testament, for vast mass of clouds.  Nefelee is a single cloud. The metaphor refers to the great amphitheater with the arena for the runners and the tiers upon tiers of seats rising up like a cloud.”[2]  However, he elaborates:  “The martures  here are not mere (emphasis mine) spectators [theatai ), but testifiers (witnesses) who testify from their own experience (Heb 11:2,4-5,33,39) to God’s fulfilling his promises as shown in Heb 11.”[3]  But is Hebrews 12:1 referring to the “witnesses” or to their “witness,” i.e., their “testimony”?  The USB New Testament Handbook seems to agree with Roberson: “The thought is that the Old Testament heroes are watching how the writer of Hebrews and his readers ‘run their race’ in the Christian life, since their own salvation is linked with that of Christians (Heb 11:40). This large crowd of witnesses consists of the heroes of faith recorded in chapter 11.”[4]  Wuest offers an alternative view: “Rather than seeing the witnesses as spectators looking at this earthly scene from heaven, it would seem nearer the correct interpretation here to think of these first century readers running their Christian race, not having in mind the witnesses of 11:4-40 as spectators, but rather their testimony as examples urging them on to faith in Messiah as High Priest.”[5]

The “Wherefore” (therefore) that begins this verse alerts the reader that what follows must be taken in context with what came before, i.e., “The Faith Hall of Fame.”  Because of these examples of faith – these “witnesses,” these “testimonies” – we are to “run with patience the race that is set before us.”  The examples are an enormous cloud on which we can lay hold.  “Are compassed about” translates the Greek échontes perikemeínon.  The first word, échontes, is a present, active, participle meaning to “have, hold, wear, be able or consider.”  The active voice indicates that the subject (we) is performing the action.  This indicates that we “have” or we “hold” this “great cloud of witnesses.”  The second word, perikemeínon, is a present, middle, participle meaning to “be around, surround or wear.”  The middle voice suggests that the subject acts in relation to himself.  Together the translation could be rendered: “We hold around ourselves so great a cloud of witnesses.”  Since it is impractical to think that we are holding on to saints that have gone on before, it makes more sense that we hold around ourselves their testimonies of faith.  These are the witnesses of Hebrews 12:1!  “The noun witness, even where it has the idea of looking on, anticipates bearing witness later to what had been seen earlier.  The heroes of Hebrews [11] attest to the fact that faith brings approval from God.  Believers are surrounded by this O.T. host of witnesses.  Because this is true, Christians are to run their race with endurance.”[6]

Who or what are witnesses?  The answer is both.  Witnesses are those who testify or give witness to an event, and they are the testimonies or those things which bear witness to an event.  In Acts 1:8 Jesus told His disciples, “ye shall be My witnesses” (note that there is no choice in the matter).  In Hebrews 12:1 we are encouraged to persist in our witness as we lay hold of the great testimonies of those who have gone before us.  This would not only include Bible saints, but the saints that are enduring the race along with us.  Let us also remember that God has provided substantial “witnesses” in our own lives by the way He has guided us and provided for us individually in the past.


[1] Strong’s translations are copied from the Biblesoft’s New Exhaustive Strong’s Numbers and Concordance with Expanded Greek-Hebrew Dictionary, (Copyright © 1994, 2003, 2006 Biblesoft, Inc. and International Bible Translators, Inc.).

[2]  From Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament, (Electronic Database Copyright © 1997, 2003, 2005, 2006 by Biblesoft, Inc., Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament, Copyright © 1985 by Broadman Press).

[3]  Ibid.

[4]  From the UBS New Testament Handbook Series, (Copyright © 1961-1997, by United Bible Societies).

[5]  From Wuest’s Word Studies from the Greek New Testament, (Copyright 1940-55 by Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Copyrights © renewed 1968-73 by Jeannette I. Wuest).

[6]  Toussaint, Stanley D., The Epistle to the Hebrews, class notes, Revised, Spring 2008, p. 32.

Comments Off on Who or What Are Witnesses?

Filed under Apologetics, Christianity, Religion

Four Gospels, One Jesus

 

… by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth… for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved. (Acts 4:10,12)

There are some that question the veracity of the Bible due to the apparent discrepancies or inconsistencies in the Four Gospel accounts of Jesus.  However, the fact that we have four different gospels, from four different writers with four different perspectives of Jesus is actually beneficial.  A good illustration of this is the scene of an automobile accident.  Rarely is a police officer around when the accident takes place, so when he arrives, he will solicit input from as many witnesses as are willing to testify.  Let us assume that an accident takes place at an intersection at sunset.  A westbound car makes a left turn and collides with a car going the opposite direction.  Witness “A” was behind the car making the left turn.  “A” says that the left turn arrow was green when he saw it, and he was prepared to follow the car turning left.  Witness “B” was in the car next to Witness “A” in a straight-ahead lane.  “B” says he is not sure that the left turn arrow was green, but the cars in front of him had stopped for the red light in their lanes.  “I couldn’t see the light clearly because the sun was in my eyes,” he reports.  Witness “C” was eastbound behind the car that got hit.  Witness “C” says the light had just turned green when the car in front of her shot out across the intersection and got wiped out by the car making the left turn.  Witness “D” was stopped at the light facing south.  He was busy checking his cell phone messages while he waited his turn to go.  All of a sudden he heard the sound of squealing tires followed by a loud crash.  When he looked up, all he saw were glass and car parts flying everywhere.

Each of these witnesses saw the same accident from four different points of view.  The police officer must then try to compile all these differing reports to come up with an accurate picture of what happened.

Another illustration that comes to mind that is a little more personal.  I am known by many different people, and if they were all to write something about me, they would probably all have something different to say.  I sing in the church choir, so someone may write about my love for music.  I also teach Sunday school, so someone else might write about my love for studying and teaching the Bible.  I taught elementary school, and my students thought I was the best teacher ever!  My teacher friends could write about my dedication to my students and the hard work I put into teaching my kids.  My wife could write things about me that no one else has seen.  But with all these different points of view, I am still the same person, and no one point of view tells the whole story.

The same is true for the story of Jesus.  The four gospel writers provide four different perspectives from four individual points of view.  Matthew was a disciple that had been called away from a lucrative career as a tax collector (Mark 2:14).  As a tax collector, he was hated by his fellow Jews and seen as a traitor to his people. “The publicans were also regarded as traitors and apostates, defiled by their frequent contacts with the heathen and being willing tools of the oppressor.”[i] Understanding the mentality of the Jewish people, oppressed under the heel of Rome, and having witnessed the resurrected Christ, Matthew was able to perceive the authority of Jesus, so he writes his gospel to show Christ as the promised Messiah destined to reign from the throne of David.

John Mark wrote the Gospel of Mark.  He was not one of the twelve, but he seems to have been “around” to witness some of the acts of Jesus.  In fact, it is thought that John Mark described himself as the “young man” present at the time of Jesus’ arrest that “fled from them naked” (Mark 14:51-52).  Tradition has it that Mark wrote most of his gospel as related to him by Peter.  Being a “young man” and probably used to serving around the house, his perspective of Jesus was that of a servant dedicated to the mission assigned to Him by His Father; so his gospel is written with that sense of urgency.

Luke was a Greek, not a Jew.  He was also a medical doctor – a scientist, if you will.  Luke is very interested in facts and details and he points out many things that the other gospel writers do not even notice.  Luke addresses his Gospel to an official by the name of Theophilus (translated “Lover of God).  Luke is trying to make a case for Jesus being the “Son of Man” rejected by Israel and now preached to the Gentiles.  Jesus is for all mankind and not for just a select group.

Finally, John was the “disciple whom Jesus loved.”  The relationship is not very clear, but it is thought that he was a close cousin of Jesus.  From the cross, Jesus entrusted the care of His mother to this disciple (John 19:27).  From this close relationship, John was able to discern the deity of Christ, so his gospel is filled with examples that make this point clear.

From all of these gospels, we conclude that Jesus was the promised Messiah, the Anointed One of Israel, the Son of God.  He was God in the flesh, the Son of Man.  He came to serve and to do His Father’s will by dying for the sins of man and for our redemption.  He is the Eternal Word.  He is God.  He is the Creator (John 1:1-3).  He is love personified.  “God is Love” (1 John 4:8, 16).  “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (John 3:16).  We could not have so clear a picture of Jesus without the different perspectives of the four Gospel writers.


[i] Unger, Merrill F. and R. K. Harrisson, The New Unger’s Bible Dictionary (Chicago, Moody Press, 1988), Listing for “Publican.”

Comments Off on Four Gospels, One Jesus

Filed under Apologetics, Christianity, Gospel, Religion

Known of God

Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee … (Jeremiah 1:5)

O LORD, thou hast searched me, and known me. (Psalm 139:1)

Psalm 139 is a beautiful theological treatise on the attributes of God.  The first six verses expressing His omniscience begin with an emphatic declaration: “thou hast searched me, and known me” (v. 1).  This truth statement emphasizes the intimacy with which God is acquainted with us, even in the minutest details of our being.  The same intimacy applies to our every act, our “downsitting” and our “uprising” (v. 2), and furthermore, He knows the motives behind our actions before the thought even crosses our mind: “thou understandeth my thought afar off” (v. 2) “and art acquainted with all my ways” (v. 3).  Not only is God aware of our present, but He is equally knowledgeable of our past and of our future: “Thou hast beset me behind and before and laid thine hand upon me” (v. 5).

God is ever present with us. “Whither shall I go from thy spirit or wither shall I flee from thy presence?” (v. 7).  There is nowhere we can go to escape God’s presence – nowhere in the vastness of heaven (space) nor in the abode of the dead (Sheol) (v. 8).  There is no darkness deep enough to hide us from His presence (v. 11-12).

God’s omnipotence, His unlimited power, is demonstrated in His creation, especially in the creation of the human body.  “I am fearfully [awesomely] and wonderfully [lit. uniquely] made” (v. 14).  The human body is composed of over 30 trillion (30,000,000,000,000) cells, each of which is a marvel of design and complexity.  What is more amazing is the fact that evolutionists examine a single human cell and attribute it to time and chance.  It is no wonder that God’s Word proclaims: “The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God” (Psalm 14:1).

These days the word “awesome” is used to describe anything from a really juicy hamburger to a thrilling ride on the Texas Giant rollercoaster.  What a sorry devaluation of the word!  “Awesome” can truly only be said of God.  If we would but take the time to wonder at the awesomeness of God, surely we would not have the words that God gave to David in this Psalm.  Surely, we would be left speechless – without words.  Surely, the revelation should move us from the realization that we are intimately known to the desire to be better known and to be re-formed more into His image. Surely, we should fall on our faces before Him and plead, “Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts: And see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting” (vv. 23-24).  What else would there be for us to do!

1 Comment

Filed under Apologetics, Atheism, Christianity, Creation, Pro-life, Religion, Theology